Gold Remains The Best Pandemic Insurance

Bailouts and stimulus are not the best solution to the Covid pandemic.

What is? Possibly…insurance.

I know it's far from perfect, but I think it could still be the best overall option.

On some level, it's surprising that the role of insurance has gotten so little attention in this crisis.

After all, us and future generations will have to pay for all these massive bailouts.

Of course, most of that responsibility has fallen on government so far.

Some have resorted to printing, while others have turned to selling a portion of their gold reserves.

In my view, that points to the ultimate solution; we should all be aiming to self-insure.

And gold promises to be a top choice to that end.

Pandemic Insurance: Underrated?

In its latest report, the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB), a joint effort by the world Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank Group, said the pandemic has cost over $11 trillion so far.

The GPMB suggests that proper preparation for the pandemic would instead have cost about $5 per person or about $39 billion. Maybe, maybe not. These massive programs tend to snowball and take on a life of their own.

But what about the role of insurance? We already have it for infrequent disasters like fires, earthquakes or flooding.

I'm no actuary. And I know that global pandemics are, thankfully, a lot less frequent than these other catastrophes.

Undoubtedly, the risks and costs to adequately pricing premiums against pandemic losses are complex. Insurance companies themselves sometimes turn to reinsurers, when the risks are too large for them to take on their own.

But logically, if global pandemics are rare one-in-fifty or one-in-one hundred year occurrences, then it would stand to reason that premiums might be low, in part because insurers would likely have decades during which to collect and build reserves.

One thing is clear, there's been a notable difference between how developed and developing nations are reacting to the fallout of this Covid crisis.

West vs. East

While mature economies have turned to the printing press, emerging markets have faced much higher restrictions. They simply don't enjoy the same access to debt markets.

Instead, they must turn to external financing, which often means raising funds in foreign currencies. Still, some of these have easier access to debt right now, like India, the Philippines and Colombia. But a higher dependence exports puts them at higher risk of capital flight and declining capital inflows.

A S&P Global Ratings report recently explained the phenomenon:

Advanced countries typically have deep domestic capital markets, strong public institutions (including independent central banks), low and stable inflation, and transparency and predictability in economic policies. These attributes allow their central banks to maintain large government bond holdings without losing investor confidence, creating fear of higher inflation, or triggering capital outflow. Conversely, sovereigns with less credible public institutions and less monetary, exchange rate and fiscal flexibility have less capacity to monetize fiscal deficits without running the risk of higher inflation. This may trigger large capital outflows, devaluing the currency and prompting domestic interest rates to rise, as seen in Argentina over parts of the past decade.

While I agree with most of this, I'm not so sure about the "independent central banks" part.

Still, in my view the restricted access to debt markets may actually turn to the advantage of some less developed countries.

As the printing press has gone into overdrive across most of the West, inflation expectations have risen dramatically over the past eight months.

With many emerging markets being commodity exporters, rising resources prices could be a boon to them over the next several years. Copper prices, for example, are up 50% since their March lows.

But the limited ability of developing nations to print and stimulate has meant a much bigger reliance on their own savings.

Some countries have had a deep understanding of and affinity toward gold for centuries.

So it's little wonder that they've been leading the way over the past decade accumulating the precious metal.

Until this past quarter, we have to go back nearly a full decade for a time when central banks were net sellers of gold.

As Bloomberg reported, some of these sellers have recently capitalized on record high gold prices in order to soften the blow of the coronavirus pandemic.

The World Gold Council said that Turkey and Uzbekistan have been among the biggest sellers, with Russia indicating it sold in Q3, its first time in 13 years.

Build Your Own Insurance Policy

The big takeaway is that these nations have been building their rainy-day fund for a long time.

It's true that this time it didn't just rain, it was a deluge.

But the point is they had a backup reserve. And when needed, it delivered.

It also certainly didn't hurt that gold did was it's supposed to. It rose in the face of chaos. And that allowed those central banks to sell some of their gold at record highs, needing to sell fewer ounces for the same proceeds than just a few months earlier.

That's the lesson for us as individuals.

Gold is the ultimate form of savings, and the best possible insurance policy.

With an end to the pandemic within sight but still a way off, that insurance is about to get a whole lot more valuable.

Peter Krauth is a former portfolio adviser and a 20-year veteran of the resource market, with special expertise in energy, metals and mining stocks. He has been editor of a widely circulated resource newsletter, and contributed numerous articles to Kitco.com, BNN Bloomberg and the Financial Post. Krauth holds a Master of Business Administration from McGill University and is headquartered in resource-rich Canada.

Disclosure
1) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. Streetwise Reports was not involved in any aspect of the article preparation. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports LLC for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article.
2) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports' terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
3) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the decision to publish an article until three business days after the publication of the article. The foregoing prohibition does not apply to articles that in substance only restate previously published company releases.

********